BREAKING: Mendocino County District Attorney David Eyster has issued a defiant 27-page response to a scathing audit from the California State Auditor, questioning the legitimacy of his use of public funds for annual staff events. This urgent development comes just days after the audit’s findings were made public, raising serious concerns over Eyster’s spending practices.
The audit, released on December 5, 2023, reveals that Eyster has misused approximately $800,000 in public asset forfeiture funds, specifically targeting his annual steakhouse dinners, which are claimed to be “training” events. State auditors determined these gatherings, attended by over 75 guests including family and friends, do not qualify as legitimate training expenses.
In his response, Eyster contends that state auditors may have “gone rogue,” suggesting their findings could undermine the independence of his office. He argues that he has been transparent in his financial dealings, stating, “no secret payroll codes were found to have been used in DA transactions,” and that his office adheres to strict financial guidelines.
“The District Attorney’s Office assures that its use of asset forfeiture funding has been lawful,” stated Grant Parker, the California State Auditor.
However, Parker’s team firmly disputes Eyster’s claims, asserting that his expenditures violate both state and federal laws regarding the use of public funds, particularly in relation to religious organizations. They specifically cite Eyster’s $5,000 donation to a local religious school, labeling it a prohibited gift of public funds.
The audit’s findings echo previous concerns raised by Mendocino County Auditor Chamise Cubbison, who has been embroiled in a bitter dispute with Eyster after he attempted to criminally prosecute her over unrelated financial issues. That case was dismissed, costing taxpayers at least $400,000 in legal fees.
As the controversy escalates, Eyster’s annual dinners, dating back to 2011, are under increased scrutiny. Earlier this year, he spent $3,600 on his latest “End of the Year Debriefing and Training,” further fueling allegations of mismanagement and misuse of public funds.
The stakes are high for Eyster as his office faces not only public criticism but potential legal ramifications from the audit’s findings. The resolution of this conflict could reshape fiscal practices in Mendocino County and impact how local officials handle public funds.
Moving forward, residents are urged to stay informed as this story develops. The implications of this audit could have far-reaching effects on county governance and public trust in local officials. What happens next will be closely watched by constituents and lawmakers alike.
