URGENT UPDATE: A newly surfaced recap of Theodore Roosevelt’s speech, delivered on February 5, 1916, at the Brooklyn Institute of Arts, has sparked renewed interest in his views on global conflict and military preparedness. This revelation is especially significant for residents of Dickinson, North Dakota, where Roosevelt’s connections to the area are still fondly remembered.
In his address, Roosevelt emphasized the need for a robust military, proposing a mobile army of 150,000 and a total regular army of approximately 250,000 troops. His remarks come at a time when questions about military preparedness are more relevant than ever.
Reflecting on his experiences as a deputy sheriff in the wild west, Roosevelt stated, “If we mean to prepare, we should prepare in good earnest.” He drew parallels between past and present, arguing that the United States must not only make promises but also back them with action.
Roosevelt’s call for a strong military presence is accompanied by a plea for a world league to enforce peace. He asserted that such a league should be contingent upon the U.S. demonstrating its reliability and readiness to act: “We must show that we keep our promises,” he urged.
In a poignant moment, he highlighted the conflict between human rights and property rights, stating, “While their first duty is to the United States, they have a second duty to humanity at large.” This powerful message resonates in today’s global climate, where issues of human rights are at the forefront of international discourse.
Roosevelt’s address not only recalls his storied past in Dickinson, where he once captured law-breakers, but it also serves as a reminder of the importance of preparedness in the face of global uncertainty. His former ranch foreman, Sylvane Ferris, still resides in Dickinson, bridging the past with the present.
As this speech circulates anew, it raises critical questions about how we approach military readiness and our responsibilities on the world stage. Community members, particularly those who remember Roosevelt’s legacy, are encouraged to reflect on his words, especially amidst ongoing discussions about U.S. foreign policy and military strategy.
Stay tuned for more updates on how this historical speech is influencing current debates on military preparedness and humanitarian responsibilities.
